Legal Medicine
Volume 12, Issue 6 , Pages 296-299, November 2010

Attitudes regarding reporting healthcare-associated patient deaths to the police: A nationwide survey of physicians and RMs in Japanese teaching hospitals

  • Shoichi Maeda

      Affiliations

    • Graduate School of Health Management, Keio University, 4411 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8530, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel./fax: +81 466 49 6251.
  • ,
  • Etsuko Kamishiraki

      Affiliations

    • Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
  • ,
  • Jay Starkey

      Affiliations

    • University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive, 0742, La Jolla, CA 92093-0742, USA
  • ,
  • Noriaki Ikeda

      Affiliations

    • Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan

Received 12 July 2010; received in revised form 5 August 2010; accepted 6 August 2010. published online 03 September 2010.

Abstract 

In Japan, healthcare professionals are required by Article 21 of the Medical Practitioner’s Law to report “unnatural deaths” to the police in cases of healthcare-associated patient death. The attitudes of medical personnel at the forefront of clinical medicine regarding reporting have not been described. We investigate the attitudes of physicians and risk managers (RMs) regarding reporting to the police under different circumstances. We sent standardized questionnaires to all hospitals in Japan that participate in the National General Residency Program. We asked physicians and RMs to indicate if they would report to the police or not under scenarios including cases where medical error is present, uncertain, or absent. We also asked if they would report when medical error had occurred and the cause-of-death was directly related, possibly related, or unrelated. We found most physicians believe they would report to the police if medical error clearly caused patient death. We found most RMs believe they would advise physicians to report given the same situation. Less but still a large number of participants favor reporting even when cause-of-death is not clearly related to medical care provided. This tendency persisted even when given a scenario where the hospital director opposed the decision to report.

Keywords: Healthcare related death, Medical malpractice, Article 21 of the Medical Practitioner’s Law, Reporting to the police, Nationwide survey

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1344-6223(10)00118-5

doi:10.1016/j.legalmed.2010.08.001

Legal Medicine
Volume 12, Issue 6 , Pages 296-299, November 2010